|
|
Cassio, The tun module works correctly for linux kernels past 2.4.6 , I think, but I don't recommend using 2.4 kernels under 2.4.9, and probably would say to stick to point-releases 2, 9, 13, 17 and higher. Those are relatively stable, 9 and 17+ being popular with distros. You don't need to install tun 1.1 if your kernel includes tun 1.4 . Doing so is not an upgrade. (That's a statement that rates up there with the "coffee is hot" warning I read on my coffee cup this morning, like I don't know this already and I don't have the sense to not burn myself. Do we need to alter the tun page and put a huge Coffee Is Hot style warning?) You could try a patch of the tun module from a higher kernel, but .. no, forget I suggested that. Don't go hand-hacking your kernel package and make-installing yourself a support nightmare. Upgrade your distro to the latest tested-and-approved release your vendor has, and you should have a very good tun module in your kernel after that. With any luck, your distro (one gold star for debian, even if it's untested) will have a shiny 2.4.18 kernel for you to use, which should work really well. The performance differences, especially under crushing load, are apparently noticable. (yes, I enjoy rebuilding my kernel RPM over IPSec-intermezzo drives while I'm taping Law&Order with my TV card. Can I have a few more seti@home jobs, too?) No, that's not what I meant. 2.4.<7 kernels actually fall over spectacularly under load, randomly KILLing processes. It's a party. - bish Seen it himself. Cassio Polpo de Campos wrote: Hi, all.
|