[OpenVPN home] [Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next]
[OpenVPN mailing lists] [Thread Prev] [Thread Index] [Thread Next]
Google
 
Web openvpn.net

RE: [Openvpn-users] Release: OpenVPN-GUI for Windows v1.0-beta2


  • Subject: RE: [Openvpn-users] Release: OpenVPN-GUI for Windows v1.0-beta2
  • From: "Tyrone Omidi" <tyrone.omidi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2004 15:22:14 +0100

You could have user and service modes like VNC does.  To start with, you
could simply have options to start/stop/restart the service. Makes it
easier than talking someone through going into services. Quick for
admins too.  The tail -f option on the log file would be very good.

I think the openvpnserv.exe would need to be modified to start
individual configs on demand?

In reply to sam,
I think it could become complicated if you implement GUI configuration.
But that's still arguably easier than the config file, especially is
help is available for each option.

As far as auto config for road warriors is concerned, that's kinda taken
care of in OpenVPN version 2 with push/pull options, unless you want the
program to manage keys/certs?  

I like the idea of this simple tool in the tray to do the basic tasks or
even more.  



-----Original Message-----
From: Mathias Sundman [mailto:mathias@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 04 July 2004 11:49
To: sam
Cc: Tyrone Omidi; Openvpn-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Openvpn-users] Release: OpenVPN-GUI for Windows v1.0-beta2

On Sun, 4 Jul 2004, sam wrote:

> I would rather go for automtic configuration for RoadWorriors rather
than 
> useing complicated managment tool like this.
> Remember our goal is to simplify user's administration.

Could you please elaborate what you mean with "complicated management 
tool"?

What we are discussing is just how the gui client should communicate
with 
it's openvpn processes "behind the scene". The graphical interface the 
user sees should still be as simple as possible.

Do you consider the current "look" of my gui complicated?


> Mathias Sundman wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 4 Jul 2004, Tyrone Omidi wrote:.
>> 
>>> How about options manage the service?
>> 
>> 
>> How would you like to see this implemented? Just another menu item
that 
>> can start/stop the service?
>> 
>> What about multiple configs started by the service. Should the GUI be
able 
>> to start/stop these individually? How do we do this?
>> 
>> When we have the "management protocol" ready we should be able to use
this 
>> to hook into the processes started by the service.
>> 
>> To be able to stop a process started by the service and then start it

>> again, we would need either:
>> 
>> 1. A "SUSPEND" mode in openvpn, so we can tell it to "stop", but the 
>> process should still be running, but inactive, so we later can tell
it to 
>> start again (still running as the same user as the service wrapper
started 
>> it as.).
>> 
>> 2. What Jan Kiszka suggested, an openvpn process running capable of 
>> forking of new processes with a specific config-file.
>> 
>
>

-- 
_____________________________________________________________
Mathias Sundman                  (^)   ASCII Ribbon Campaign
NILINGS AB                        X    NO HTML/RTF in e-mail
Tel: +46-(0)8-666 32 28          / \   NO Word docs in e-mail

____________________________________________
Openvpn-users mailing list
Openvpn-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users