|
|
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 07:18:42 +0000 (UTC), Kevin Goad <supergoad@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Well, in short, here is what I want to do: > http://68.48.222.152/~keving/diagram.png > > I use 192.168.0.0/24 addresses, but these seem to bypass the tunnel when I am on > a physical network that uses 192.168.0.0/24. I checked your diagram. What you are trying to do breaks the fundamental TCP/IP addressing rules. You can't have two separate physical subnets with the same subnet, and route between them unless you use NAT. As an example have the server NAT 192.168.0.X to 192.168.1.X and the remote location NAT 192.168.0.X to 192.168.2.X. When you want to connect between the two subnets use the NATed IP address. -- Leonard Isham, CISSP Ostendo non ostento. ____________________________________________ Openvpn-users mailing list Openvpn-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users |
