|
|
Konrad Karl wrote: > Hi, > > yes, I know that it may seem wierd what I want to do, but pls > look below. > > On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 01:00:31AM -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote: > >>On Tuesday 2005-October-04 09:02, Konrad Karl wrote: >> >>>---- 192.168.1.1/24 --- eth0 ---- >>> >>> | Machine A | >>> | >>> | tun0 | >>> | 10.100.0.4 | >>> >>> ------------- >>> ------------- >>> >>> | Machine M | >>> >>> ------------- >>> ------------- >>> >>> | 10.100.0.8 | >>> | tun | >>> | Machine B | >>> | ------------------------- >>> >>> ----eth0 ----192.168.2.1/24--- ROUTER -- |172.16.1.1/16 Machine D|-- >>> >>>Machines A and B are behind some NATting firewalls, Machine M has got >>>an official IP address and is only being used to establish >>>connectivity between A and B. (this connectivity is working OK) >> >>Then it looks like openvpn is not a factor here. >> >> >>>Machine A wants to access machine D via NAT/MASQUERADE on machine B. You will need to do some port forwarding on B, else everything looks normal. You should not need to worry about M if you port forward tunneled traffic. Machine A will address some port on machine B for the connection to D. cheers Erich ____________________________________________ Openvpn-users mailing list Openvpn-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users |